|
By Randy Hollenbeck
Saturday, May 10 2008, 06:59 AM
Day 5 – Still No response from the Mayor
Amazing, the leader (in name only) votes something down, is silent, and will probably gets away with it. Hey, only in Cudahy!
It was requested that I do a monthly review of the most looked at topics I wrote. I will run down the top 10 and give a small overview of each.
Some of these have an unfair advantage because they are older and have had the chance to be looked at longer. By far, the shorter time Wal-Mart articles have more people view them quicker. Many people still want to hear about Wal-Mart from both sides of the issue.
People keep emailing me offline in private and that is good. I would like people to start making comments. The South Shore viewers don’t seem to want to publicly comment, by how many private emails I get vs. the comments feature used.
- Turf War – What to Build? –Yes it is a Wal-Mart post and I talked about TIFs and how the Mayor doesn’t want the Wal-Mart and how this chance may not come again. I also included a letter from a reader that they sent to the Mayor and my responses to what the Mayor replied.
- Real Voter Intimidation – I talked about how during the 2006 election my neighbor was intimidated and took down his sign in fear of retribution from his union steward.
- ** Adults Only ** – The title maybe misleading to a few, but the subject matter was how adult content is on the web and we must watch what our children do on the web.
- One Must Look Back To See The Future – Here I wrote about that sometimes one must look back to see the future and how Mayor McCue had some foreshadowing in his campaign pledge about Wal-Mart. Cudahy, as is the nation, is in a recession and how in a downturn we should not pass up the opportunity of this Wal-Mart.
- History Repeating Page Two –I wrote about the info a reader emailed me about a Cudahy School closing and Wal-Mart spin.
- Plan Commission – I wrote about what happen at the last Plan Commission meeting about Cudahy Station. How some members didn’t even understand what they were to be voting on that night.
- Proposal On The Table – I wrote about what is the Wal-Mart proposal, TIF, and the Plan Commission.
- Teen’s Common Sense Sometimes Lacking – I wrote about a report I came across on how Florida legislators are encouraging a review of their "abstinence only" sex education programs after a recent survey completed by Florida teens returned some curious results of not understanding things like drinking bleach prevents HIV. By now way am I attacking "abstinence only", just bring to light what they found.
- Flamethrower –I wrote about what a person said to me about how I deal with the Mayor and if I hate him. I may be ruffling feathers and again once you write it, and sign it, you can’t hide from it something I wish the city would do.
- Keeping Us In The “Noir” – Keeping Us In The "Noir" is about how we are in the dark (Noir) on may things in government and how with open records laws, the information should be public and easily obtainable. I wrote about how many of these very things should be on the web at a mouse click away from you and I to read and know.
I hope everyone enjoys reading my posts. You may not agree with me, but maybe what I have to say will shed some new light on matters and make you pause. I am not a reporter, but a commentator. I do not get paid, work for the city, or have a secret agenda. I gain nothing personally from doing this blog other than the satisfaction of being able to put “The Way I See It” out for others to read. I do it because I think it needs to be said. I try to be fair and when I see something I don’t agree with, I let it be known.
I may use sarcasm at the expense of others that don’t agree with my views or me, but it is not personal just on the material.
Many people have said I am hard on the Mayor in his first year and I write blogs that don’t show his job performance in a good light. When I see something that he does great, I will blog on it.
Hey, I am not the only one blogging on the Cudahy Now website, Greg Janisch was McCue’s campaign Treasurer and he can blog. Just because I am critical of the Mayor’s job performance, does not make me a person who is attacking Ryan McCue personally nor am I character assassinating him! This is about his job performance period! We all have freedom of speech and a voice; I just choose to use mine.
Here is what a reader, Dave Taylor, said in a comment:
“Randy, there's a lot of people in Cudahy who back you up, even if they are too scared to admit it. We should all be thankful that someone is willing to take a stand for what is right for our city; like you said, "...just want Cudahy to be better", too bad there are egos that get in the way of the good the city could do. There isn't any reason to be shameful of an opinion, that's what makes us human (not robots) and why our country is a great one!
Sometimes you may feel your comments fall of deaf ears, but the truth is that people ARE reading and they ARE listening. We rally behind you and hopefully, you are stronger in your plight for a better Cudahy because of it. You are a voice that matters! You are looking out for the betterment of Cudahy! You are taking a stand, unafraid of whose feathers you ruffle! Those of us who stand behind will continue to support you, even if the “powers that be” wish we weren’t listening!
Keep up the good work…your supporters need your voice!”
Someone has talked to my superiors at mycommunitynow.com to have my work censored or shutdown. The claim was I lie, spread rumors, and have false and inaccurate information. I try to source my work and some comes from people in government that do not like the direction we are headed or people close to a situation that feel some injudicious is being done. I have always believed in correct information and not disinformation. If something is truly wrong let me know and I will correct it, but don’t be all that upset and try and shut me down because you don’t LIKE what I am saying! People if what I am hearing from those inside is true, some scary things are coming or happening. Hypothetically, it might even be something like a change of salary ordinances for health insurances that is not fair and done evenly. Should it not be changed for all and not leave out anyone? Fair is fair. That is a hypothetical, but watch it might just come true.
I will not stop until the misinformation, disinformation and no information are brought to light. More and more people are emailing me with things. These are very reliable people and trustworthy people. Together we can all make a difference. I will NEVER sell you out and I have been asked who is telling me things. The wheel of information doesn’t need to stop spinning just because it might ruffle some feathers.
Filed under: Talk Back, Life, Milwaukee Wave, Metra, Master Plan, Vote, Wal-Mart, TIF, Cudahy, Top 10 Review, Constitution, Wave, Leadership, retail, Wisconsin, Safety, school, Education, Computer, Internet, Kids, Health, Culture, Economy, Taxes, KRM, History, Mayor, Meeting
Permalink |
Mail to a friend
|
By Randy Hollenbeck
Friday, Apr 18 2008, 03:36 PM
Many communities have found the right mix of housing, retail and manufacturing to keep it viable and Cudahy needs to do the same. Cities are places where people can live, learn, work, visit and play. They should offer a wide range of services - schools, parks, health care, stores, restaurants and transportation, just to name a few. Cities that are vibrant, safe, and attractive are where residents, visitors and businesses want to be. Cudahy has what is necessary to be successful; it just needs to move forward.
To move forward you have to identify your problems, except them and fix them. Currently our city is in denial of many issues that plague our wonderful city. Also, Cudahy has a sort of Identity crisis I am told which I covered in “Cudahy's Image Problem”.
Job number one must be to stop the decline in our city’s population, job losses, and keep Cudahy money in Cudahy. To do that we must lower our crime and taxes. Crime and population go hand in hand though; do GHOST TOWNS need to worry about crime and we can have all the development in the world and the greatest park system but if everyone is afraid of going there then what's the point?
Job number two is to increase tourism traffic to Cudahy and to bring in money from outside our city.
Look at the pie chart at the bottom of this post as to “The concerns of Wisconsin Residents”
Cudahy needs to find its identity and niche. Obviously, the economy is foremost...having lost that much of the population I could only assume it was an economic issue again, taxes and a rise in crime (the issue of crime was so big I covered it in two blogs earlier). By niche, I mean find an industry, which could thrive and then create economic incentives for corporations to move here. We need to target biotech, drug industry, software and technology businesses. We must identify areas that definitely need improvement and intervention.
One of Mayor Ryan McCue’s platform statements was “We need to concentrate on keeping businesses in Cudahy and make it easy and attractive for new businesses to locate in Cudahy.” It is essential for Cudahy to keep the trucking companies that call Cudahy home. These trucking companies pay good wages and has excellent benefits. We need to keep the moniker of truck alley. I know many people in attendance at the common council meetings in the past have talk bad about all of the trucks on the streets of Cudahy. That is a sign of a living city, I have told them. One woman told me “I just wish they were in some other city, not ours.” We will never make everyone happy. This is the same sediment the Wal-Mart has on some people.
Right now, we are a city losing jobs and people who live in the community. Our enrollment in Cudahy schools is down. Some people confuse the issue of specialty stores with big business retailer. We need the big business retailer, Wal-Mart, to increase the standard of living of the residents who live in Cudahy. The specialty stores help increase tourist traffic, not to say the Cudahy residents will not shop them because they will, but the very nature of the word “specialty shops” should be a clue. This is not a daily or weekly destination, but a place to go for a special need, which is why many of them fail.
Once Wal-Mart is given the go ahead “The Shops of Cudahy” will fill-up with tenants. Currently the prospective tenants would like to hangout in the weeds until Wal-Mart is named. There is to be a hotel built on this 26-acre property. That too is in limbo until Wal-Mart is named. You have the classic “Chicken and the Egg.”
Yes, we need to increase tourism, but it is more important to stem the tide of good residents leaving our community and jobs moving elsewhere. One-person blogged on the public forum about Generations of pride and that his own kids have moved out of Cudahy. This is exactly why we need to make a reason for people to stay living in Cudahy. Having a high tourism and high amount of people moving out will not cancel each other out as some people think. It starts with this Wal-Mart, which is a destination of Cudahy residents.
Of course, the Mayor doesn’t like this Wal-Mart, check that, is not a fan of Wal-Mart and he doesn’t feel it is a destination spot, because he is looking through glasses marked tourism. The part of the Master Plan is an excuses, it is not ridged but flexible. Many communities have a Wal-Mart in them, why would someone from outside our community want to shop our Wal-Mart if they already have one. They wouldn’t unless their Wal-Mart is out of a particular item, ours is closer to where they work, or they simply like to shop ours. It is mainly for the residents, not tourism.
Obviously, the Mayor (who shops Wal-Mart) is not concerned enough about the citizens living in Cudahy, and is worried more about just how to drive up tourism to Cudahy. That is only one side of the problem. Take off the tourism glasses and use your own eyes to see that both can be accomplished. Wal-Mart for the Cudahy citizens and the specialty shops for tourism along with the Wave Center. There are plenty of vacancies dotting Cudahy that would work perfectly for specialty shops besides this need to be placed in Cudahy Station. We only need find them and to fill them.
The Wave complex can host soccer training in 60,000 sq ft and doubles as a 40,000 sq ft convention center once converted to that mode. It will have a pull of 100-mile radius. That includes 60,000 soccer moms and dads shopping, eating and driving around Cudahy. Talk about large numbers of shoppers!
Cudahy needs this Wal-Mart and we need it to be successful. Our future depends on it. This Wal-Mart is not the savior, but it is the first piece of a puzzle called “How to grow and fix Cudahy.” It is imperative to our revitalization that this large retailer comes to Cudahy and the responsible thing to do for our city to prosper. Some say that we are just copying what other cities have and that it does not set us a part. To this I say, why not move out all grocery stores, gas stations since everyone has one. The answer lies in conveniences. Why should we drive to another city to get our consumables? This Cudahy Station, with Wal-Mart as the anchor, is vital to our growth and prosperity. Cudahy Station will generate more foot traffic that will help to sustain existing businesses, encourage new businesses to develop, deter crime, and boost the city's tax base. Having more people around does deter crime, there is less time for the crime of opportunity. This does not mean crime will be zero; it will happen whether Wal-Mart or another store is here! Good planning leads to orderly growth and helps us to have the type of community we want.
Cities on the rise are enjoying developmental booms, embracing their history and their geography. Stimulating the local economy for businesses and the job market, will in turn keep people in Cudahy and will keep us growing. The military has a saying called the “6P’s”--- Proper --- Planning --- Prevents --- Piss --- Poor --- Performance, and if we follow that, we cannot fail.
What has plagued us in the past will haunt us. A lack of vision and the carelessness nature of local politicians in the past has cost us dearly. The town was governed by entirely by old-timers who were dead set against any kind of change and are running the town into the ground. Status Quo is the term to describe that type of thinking.
It's the "we can do without that" mentality that suppresses new ideas for economic expansion. I think that is what has kept young people from being drawn to and staying in Cudahy. We need to engage them and entice them to stay.
Many locals want to retain a mid-sized city atmosphere but there is a great deal of influence from developers to change the demographics. I am in favor of that as well, as long as the intent is not to push out the lower income elderly. If we could push out or evict the lower income people who don’t want to work but instead live off the system, let us do it. Far too long Cudahy has allowed the slumlords to use Cudahy and us.
Renters are fine as long as they care about the property, and contribute to the prosperity of the community. Many do not. Sometimes it does follow the lower income, but that is a case-by-case thing. Would I like have the tax revenue of $300,000 plus homes, yes as long as it doesn’t change who we are. Too many people would like to remake Cudahy into Whitefish Bay and that will not happen. Cudahy is hard working class of people. We can have a successful mix.
I would support the KRM if taxes didn’t go up and the answer to that is private funding. Funny how the people upset with the TIF are okay with taxes going up to fund the KRM.
So funny, don’t you think?
Yes, it would be an excellent opportunity existing to lure some of those new transplants into our neighborhood with several mixed-use projects featuring condos, lofts, and apartments in various price ranges.
Yes, tourism development would be nice. Many proposed projects in Cudahy are shot down because the taxpayers are tired of paying for everything. With some outside (tourist), revenue coming in we could get some help then the rest could follow. I am just not convinced the KRM will make it and I don’t want to be the one paying for it then. We you are on the right side you don’t have to do any convincing!
New residences downtown will generate more foot traffic that will help to sustain existing businesses, encourage new businesses to develop, deter crime, and boost the city's tax base. We can entice people to move to our downtown, which already has all of the ingredients necessary to sustain residents (library, restaurants, shops, bars, pharmacies, banks, workplaces, houses of worship, etc.) if only Cudahy didn’t have the stigma of land of high taxes. Adding more taxes for the KRM is not the answer especially as the country heads for a long recession. We need to conserve our money. I understand the philosophy that “you have to spend money to make money,” just now is not that time.
The "growth of a city" depends upon each individual in it. Simply put, how we are treating each other. I have said this before. It’s not size. It’s not money. The better we treat each other that is the growth. A modest size city where people treat each other well will attract much to it, everything that it needs to expand.
Yes, I become very discouraged and feel very sad to see so many people bashing my city all the time, but I know only better times are ahead for it (especially if and when I climb the political ladder as many of you would like me to do).
Cities need visionary, non-corrupt governments to progress and grow (I am not necessarily saying ours is). The officials need to stop focusing on such micro issues, where if they focused on bigger picture problems, the micro problems would eventually be fixed. The free market place has, in many cases led the change, as long as it was not tampered with. Good planning leads to orderly growth and helps us to have the type of community we want. Cities on the rise are enjoying developmental booms, embracing their history and their geography.
The Mayor's job responsibilities vary widely, but all are intended to ensure the well-being of the city and its people. The Mayor and council members have the responsibility of representing not only the people who elected them, but all citizens. Council members also serve as a resource to the residents of their district, making sure they receive quality services and helping them to solve problems. Priority must be given to the well-being of the city and its people and is in an ongoing process to do so.
None of us are Mayors or are in charge (except the Mayor, Ryan McCue), but through this forum/blog our voices may be heard. We still may not hear from the powers that be, but they will read your comments.
Everyone is looking for a formula that will provide healthy growth and stimulate the local economy for businesses and the job market. With the challenges and opportunities we have, we can move forward and succeed. We all must be trying to breathe life into our city and care about each other. We must stem the tide of population and job loss. We must lower crime and taxes. We must, because if you don’t, Cudahy will become a GHOST TOWN.
Does the Mayor and its city officials get a report card? I am working on that!
Maybe we should do an online one.
What problems does our city have and what suggestions do you have to help our city grow? So what would you do if you were Mayor of Cudahy?
Each generation goes further than the generation preceding it because it stands on the shoulders of that generation. You will have opportunities beyond anything we've ever known. - Ronald Reagan
|
By Randy Hollenbeck
Wednesday, Apr 16 2008, 04:51 PM
I get the impression Wal-Mart is NOT really interested in the Pennsylvania and Layton site as some people would wish they should be.
This is our last, best hope for a Wal-Mart! Period. People please don’t fall under the spell that a gift like this will come again!
In working with Cobalt, the long narrowness of the site, coupled with the environmental problems, won't generate enough revenue to probably make it economically affordable.
I respect Joe Henika very much, but I think he is “Naïve” in thinking Wal-Mart will want to stay focused and willing to build in Cudahy.
Contrary to belief, everyone’s driveway is a destination! I strive to park my car every day and plan my day to do so. Maybe some don’t feel that way and don’t want to go home. I want to see my family!
Wal-Mart is a destination! Any shopping place is! Unless you are talking tourism.
Based on numbers run by Cobalt, to get about $10 million in TIF assistance on the environmental on that site, they needed to create $53 million in development for the numbers to work. People, they will ask for TIF money! Any business building in Cudahy in a TIF can!
Is it that all TIFs are bad or just bad at Cudahy Station?
Is 10 Million the most ever asked for?
What is the most ever received?
I just wanted to clarify something Wal-Mart is not getting a TIF; the TIF is for the Wave.
In the Mayor’s 2008 State of the city address, 36 minutes into the speech, he states “Wal-Mart itself is not asking for a tax [TIF] subsidy.” I just think it needs to be said again. Taxpayers are not paying for Wal-Mart.
Again, anyone can ask for a TIF. Not all do, Joe Halser (City Lounge Co-Owner) was kind enough to inform me that City Lounge is in a TIF district but they have never received nor requested to receive any tax dollars for their venture. It has all been privately funded.
Does Cudahy have a master list available to look at what TIFs have been requested and approved over the years? Does the Mayor have the last say if one is approved? Who’s name is stamped on the document?
With all of this fuss over the Cudahy Station TIF, don’t you think the city should have the records posted for the public to see? After all, we are paying for it!
As Mayor McCue said, “Once elected as your next mayor, I will work hard to attract new business that will benefit and enhance our community. At the same time, I will not give unnecessary incentives to developers.” Source
How do we know if unnecessary incentives are or were given to developers? Remember the classic Ronald Reagan quote “Trust, but verify.”
Cudahy offered $8 million in TIF funds for the United States Bowling Congress to locate in a new 70,000-square-foot building at Cudahy Station, located at the intersection of Layton and Nicholson avenues. The building would have cost $13.5 million to build.
http://www.entrepreneur.com/localnews/1603842.html
The part about Cudahy offering the $8 million tax [TIF] subsidy to get $13.5 million building is truly amazing. If the residents of Cudahy knew about that one, they would go ballistic!
Oops, I guess I just told them if they didn’t see it already.
I am told from Mayor McCue, that the information from The Business Journal of Milwaukee is wrong. Neither the city nor the Mayor can offer a TIF. The developer must request one. Mayor McCue said it should be that the developer Continental Properties, offered it to the Bowling Congress. I just wanted to include what Mayor McCue had to say.
How can a developer make an offer to a business, that has only days to make a decision whether to move, if the whole process takes time and has to go to the committees in regard to how a TIF gets approved? Can it be fast tracked?
In the end, would Mayor McCue have approved or rejected the TIF request for the Bowling Congress? What do you think? I think he would accept. This was a highly publicized, high profile item in the news.
Can you imagine if Joe Henika knew that they were giving $8 million tax [TIF] subsidy to get $13.5 million building? Again, I just told him. Please, someone check in on Joe.
I can't believe that the Milwaukee Journal did not report about the incentives offered. Well, I guess I can.
Pennsylvania and Layton site - Even when the market was booming, at most, with a Wal-Mart Supercenter, two to three medium box stores (size of Best Buy), and a couple of small special stores or a restaurant closer to Layton, top end you could only push about $47 million in assessed value on the site. (Remember there is a height restriction of no more than three floors.)
That is why, if Wal-Mart doesn't feel that they can get the city to move in the next 30 days, they will probably throw in the towel on Cudahy, and move onto other sites in other cities. Other more cooperative and welcoming, not to mention, an organized city.
In the end, we will be driving, and the steel will be rusting, the city will be cowering (having to cleanup the site) and because of the issue those NO group are making on the TIF, the next developer will not come forward because of the false stigma of asking for a TIF. Nothing like shooting yourself in the foot. We will sit on it, just as the Mayor wants us to do.
We can drive for our goods. We don’t need a convenience of having a Wal-Mart in Cudahy. Right? Why have any retail in Cudahy, we can all drive to Oak Creek.
Those that twist the truth when convenient shall be tangled in their own ways!
If I'm the problem, then I'm the one that needs to get out of the way so it can get better. If somebody else is the problem, then they've got to be big enough to step out of the way or do what is right!
Maybe it is my own “Naïveté” that sees this!
Here is an email I received and my response back, with some additional comments. Please people keep the emails coming.
Mr. Hollenbeck,
My name is (removed, by request), I've been a Cudahy resident for about 17 years and like you, I actively support this Wal-Mart. I'm behind you 100%. About two weeks ago, I decided to ask Mayor McCue about the plan, I said he should think about what the citizens want and put his own negative thoughts behind for the benefit of the citizens. I wrote him a letter and this is what I stated:
Dear Mr. McCue, I’m writing as a Cudahy citizen to urge you to reconsider your thoughts about the Wal-Mart plan. I’ve lived in Cudahy for about seventeen years and I have seen many things come and go around here, and I’m writing to say that we need this Wal-Mart. A lot of people really want this Wal-Mart, not the whole town, but I know many people want this. I know that you have already made your statement on what you think about Wal-Mart, you have made the statement of “It’s not what were looking for the city of Cudahy.” I just want to ask what is it your trying to look for in Cudahy? What is that one thing that we need to get people to come here, I know a Wal-Mart is not a destination point or tourism attraction, but it’s something the town would like, you would be surprised on how many people in Cudahy are on a fixed income, have a tight budget or are trying to save a few dollars. You have already made your statement about Wal-Mart and what you think of it, I honestly believe that you should think about what the citizens of Cudahy want instead of trying to make Cudahy into a tourist attraction. Yes, we do need people to come to Cudahy, but we also need business. The Wal-Mart company is willing to help us out, they will bring the business that Cudahy desperately needs. You can’t let this opportunity slip away because of your negative and personal beliefs.
Don’t take offense to this Mr. McCue, but sometimes I think you need to put your own differences aside and think about what Cudahy really needs. Please reconsider the Wal-Mart plan.
A Cudahy citizen,
I wrote him that letter, on Tuesday the 1st of April, he left a message on my machine saying that he wanted to talk to me about it. I called him Friday and I told my side saying that business is what we really need. McCue had stated that he has not decided yet about the Wal-Mart. His concern is the use for the land that the Iceport is on. He said that we can do better and is a big box store really an option with the KRM rail line coming through. Stating that he thinks we can do better than putting a big box store there.
He also stated that he was misquoted in the paper saying he is "not a fan of Wal-Mart" he saying that "it just doesn't fit with our master plan." My question to you Mr. Hollenbeck is this. Did it sound like I just got the run around; to me he sounded like he answered my questions but left some openings? And do you think he has already made a decision about the Wal-Mart yet, but just isn't telling us? What is your opinion?
Here is my response back!
I think you got the double talk politician answer. Answering the question without answering it. He has not to mine or many others stated what should be in there instead.
Also, if you look back at his campaign platform ( http://ryanmccue.com ), he talks about Wal-Mart coming to Cudahy. That was when Wal-Mart was not on the Iceport, but Pennsylvania and Layton. So all of this gobbledy-gook about Wal-Mart is fine just not on the Iceport is not so much truthful as a political answer.
Yes, I do think his mind is made up, yet I do think he is softening.
The Master Plan is flexible and not rigid as the Mayor makes it out to be.
If he was misquoted “Why not have it fixed right away”? When the paper misquoted me, I have them fix the online on and run a retraction. Which they did. Why is it now he is just bringing it to light?
Maybe the reader is wrong, maybe he misheard Mayor McCue, maybe not. I was not there to know the truth (on the phone). Why would the reader lie? Why would the Mayor deny it? What can be accomplished from this?
It sounds to me that the Mayor is still banking on KRM, probably at the insistence of VandeWalle and Associates and is willing to just sit out the 20-30 years before it happens.
Didn’t your parents teach you to bank on something you know is real?
The Mayor’s view of utopia for Cudahy does not include Wal-Mart
He, Smith, the Pavlic types (remember they voted against), have no intentions of having their name on the Wal-Mart.
When I offered “YES Wal-Mart” signs to some of the city personnel they acted as if I was giving holy water to a vampire.
People, think back to the 2004 election and it was no surprise that Bruce S (lost reelection), Tom Centernowski and Jill Gestwicki (decided not to run) disappeared from the political landscape, and all voted in favor of the Iceport development. Smith survived because he had no challenger, and truth be told, if the construction had not have stopped in Feb 04, probably Jack Vaccaro would have been Mayor of Cudahy from 2004 to 2007.
|
By Randy Hollenbeck
Thursday, Mar 20 2008, 05:44 PM
Let’s see, Muskego took GE away from Cudahy
The Mayor may let The Milwaukee Wave training center slip to Franklin
The Mayor may push Wal-Mart into St. Francis, South Milwaukee, or Oak Creek
What or Who is next? Ladish, Patrick Cudahy, Roadrunner Dawes, Jeff’s Fast Freight…?
Maybe we will need the KRM train since not much will be left! We may not end up with “Always low prices,” but we will “always” have the still rusting structure to look up at.
Please contact the Mayor and your Alderperson and tell them to stop slipping away our future and companies!
Contact:
Mayor Ryan McCue
Phone Number: (W) 769-2222
Address: 3927 E Plankinton Ave
mccuer@ci.cudahy.wi.us
Alderperson First District Joseph Mikolajczak
Phone Number: (H) 483-1255
Address: 3754 E. Plankinton Avenue
mikolajczakj@ci.cudahy.wi.us
Alderperson Second District Mary Schissel
Phone Number: (H) 744-0420
Address: 3836 E Munkwitz Ave
schisselm@ci.cudahy.wi.us
Alderperson Third District Mark Otto
Phone Number: (H) 769-6626
Address: 3324 E Mallory Ave
ottom@ci.cudahy.wi.us
Alderperson Fourth District Sean Smith
Phone Number: (H) 486-6221
Address: 5618 S Rosewood Ave
smiths@ci.cudahy.wi.us
Alderperson Fifth District Name Thomas Pavlic
Phone Number: (H) 483-7116
Address: 6015 Summer Winds Ct
pavlict@ci.cudahy.wi.us
|
More Posts
|
|